Book: Readings on Argumentation

Edited by Angela J. Aguayo and Timothy R. Steffensmeier

The thirty essays in this book, drawn from the scholarly literature, represent major traditional and contemporary scholarship on argument. The essays display the evolution and widening scope of the scholarship in recent decades, as well as tensions among traditional and recent views and emphases. They reflect an array of scholarly perspectives on the values, rules, and conceptual structures that people bring to public deliberation-and that affect how they achieve agreement. The essays also examine argument in various contexts and spheres, with a particular focus on it as a vital, productive means for people to negotiate differences through discussion, especially in a diverse, democratic society.

COMMENTS FROM PROFESSORS

“With a superb blend of classic and cutting edge articles, Readings on Argumentation is an indispensable tool for graduate and undergraduate students studying argument at any level.”
William Keith
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

“I appreciate the volume’s focus on judging arguments. This focus will help me address my course goal of considering the role of argument in a diverse society.”
Robert Asen
University of Wisconsin-Madison

“For my purposes, the major strength of the book is the wide coverage of primary scholarship. The coverage of topics here is excellent. The organization is very clear and logical.”
Peter Marston
California State University, Northridge

“I especially like the inclusion of legal, scientific, and visual argument articles.”
Beth Brunk-Chavez
University of Texas at El Paso

“Well organized . . . easy to understand . . . excellent selection of articles.”
Jerry Miller
Ohio University

“The list of topics represents the breadth of the field of argumentation. . . . The readings represent some of the key writers in the field.”
Robert Trapp
Willamette University

“The major strength of the book is its selection of high-quality articles representing a significant cross-section of the eclectic and interdisciplinary field of argumentation studies.”
Brian McGee
College of Charleston

“I really like the collection of essays…. I think the organizational scheme makes sense intuitively and pedagogically.”
Kelly McDonald
Arizona State University

“I found the readings interesting and useful. The sections of the book are thematically unified and address major issues in argumentation theory. The structure of the book is helpful in clarifying and focusing on those issues.”
Matthew J. Sobnosky
Hofstra University

“I like very much the way the table of contents divides the study of argument into the three highly relevant questions or sections.”
Don Brownlee
California State University, Northridge

“I’d adopt this book in a heartbeat . . . . It would add quite a bit of depth and triangulation (and original authors) to my current book.”
Locke Carter
Texas Tech University

“I would consider this text. It contains many of the readings I offer in my class and is organized fairly closely to my course.”
Kelly Young
Wayne State University

“The major strength of this book is that it collects a number of key readings in one place-organizing them by topic. For someone who does not yet teach an argumentation class . . . this would be a useful set of materials. For someone who already teaches an argumentation class, it might simply be easier to have students purchase the reader than deal with coursepack orders.”
Danielle Wiese
Grand Valley State University

For More Information

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: